Project Rationale
Effective teacher support and buy-in for character education programs like Character Counts! enhances overall educational outcomes, optimizes resource use, and ensures sustainability. Our research focuses on the impact of “wise-interventions” with the goal of fostering positive change in attitudes, behaviors, or outcomes of the Character Counts! Program at AD Henderson University School. Interventions are used in educational settings to produce change using evidence-based practices. Wise interventions in terms of research are typically tailored to the individual's or group's specific needs, taking into account factors such as mindset, motivation, and social context. In our study the wise intervention will be composed of discussion forums where the teachers are the experts and have a free space to discuss implementation of the CC Program. These wise interventions will encompass a range of approaches, including mindset interventions, behavioral nudges, and cognitive strategies.
Analyzing wise interventions will tailor strategies, inform professional development, and enhance Character Counts! at AD Henderson University School. This research equips educators with evidence-based practices, fostering self-reflection and collaboration. Increasing teacher buy-in through these interventions is key to successful implementation, benefiting students and the educational community.
Project Context
The study targets ten middle school teachers, encompassing various content areas and elective courses. Middle school was chosen due to its current implementation of Character Count initiatives. Informal conversations, observations, and data from Character Counts Choice Boards suggest a need for increased teacher buy-in. Additionally, the administrative support for the program in middle school makes it an ideal focus. The sample includes three male and seven female teachers, with a permanent sub teaching an elective course since the school year's start. Teacher experience in the sample ranges from three to fifteen plus years in education.
Supportive Literature
Character Counts
Character Counts!, established in 1987, is one of the most widely used character education programs in the United States with evidence to support its efficacy. Reports from schools that teach character indicate that the academic performance of students is higher, attendance is improved, and there are fewer disciplinary issues (Lahey, 2013). Researchers have shown that character programming, when implemented with fidelity, produces positive results in one's character (Lickona, 2003; Edmonson, Tatman, & Slate, 2008).
Teacher Buy-In: A necessary ingredient
Historically teachers have been left out of policy discussions, decision-making and implementation (Ravitch, 2010; Fullan,2010; Lee & Min,2017 ). Teacher buy-in is often an afterthought in the era of accountability where test scores dictate curriculum decisions. According to Lee & Min (2017), teacher buy-in is made up of a teacher’s “perceptions, beliefs, and values in relation to the reform program” (pg. 372). Achieving “teacher buy-in” goes beyond a teacher’s acceptance of a new program; it means a teacher is included in the decision and is actively supporting the initiative. Fullan (2010) describes teacher buy-in as having teachers “on-side” instead of on the outside of reform merely looking in.
Macy and Wheeler (2020) studied teacher-buy to a Positive Behavior Intervention program and found that “lack of consistency, time, and support from administration” hindered buy-in. Macy and Wheeler (2020) recommended providing teachers with more time under the new program and increased professional development. Turnbull (2002) found that “teachers were most likely to ‘buy-in’ to their school reform program when they had adequate training, adequate resources, helpful support from the model developers, school-level support, administrator buy-in, and control over the reform implementation in their classrooms”. The definition of what is “adequate” training and the format of the professional development is not clear and therefore needs to be examined with teachers as the driving force.
Research Methods
Participants
Participants in the study are middle school teachers from various subject areas. The middle school teachers were chosen because of the increased occurrence of Character Counts initiatives at the level compared to the elementary and high school levels. The sample is made of three male and seven female teachers, with a permanent sub teaching an elective course since the school year's start. Teacher experience in the sample ranges from three to fifteen plus years in education. All participants are invited to participate in the Character Counts Expert Discussion Forum.
Data Collection & Analysis
Qualitative data was collected for this study. This study took place for twenty three weeks with five different 30 minute “wise intervention” sessions. Seven educators of varying experience and expertise were invited and agreed to participate. Before starting the study, a pre-survey was administered. During each intervention, the participants were encouraged (as the experts) to share their thoughts, feelings, and perceptions of the Character Counts program, professional learning opportunities, various research presented, and the overall effectiveness of the integration of Character Counts into daily school routines. Each session was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed for common themes and sentiments. ChatGPT and Claude were used to support data analysis. The transcripts were entered into the AI programs and prompted to identify common themes as well as quotes to support the themes and/or positive feelings about Character Counts. To conclude the study, a post survey was conducted. The pre and post-surveys were also analyzed for any changes in inner narratives and buy-in regarding character education, specifically Character Counts.
Results
Finding 1: Teachers expressed more “Buy-in” then we initially believed.
Five out of six teachers identified for the Character Counts Expert Discussion completed the pre-survey. Based on their responses, we found that they had more “buy-in” to Character Counts then we initially believed they did. It is clear that teachers believe in the program but one area that needs improvement is the day to day implementation of the program.
Finding 2: The Professional Development is a barrier to implementation of Character Counts
In summary, the key themes related to time are the length and frequency of PD sessions. Participants provided construction criticism regarding previous Character Counts! professional development. For example, many participants expressed the need for Professional Development to offer specific classroom strategies that integrate CC into their content area and ways to build alternative CC activities for students struggling with character. They also shared ideas regarding collaboration ideas between different subjects and parental involvement.
Quotes supporting Finding 2
- “I think teachers can find ways to incorporate team-building exercises in the beginning of classes as an ice breaker/ bell ringing activity or find other ways to incorporate character counts with the lessons that they are already doing, so that it is more achievable and accessible" (Pre-survey)
- “I felt like a lot of the PD at the beginning of this year was redundant from what we had last year and it was way too long to be beneficial… we checked out” (November 2023 )
- “But it needs to be internal as to how we make it happen and not these guys (referring to Character Counts! Program speakers )” (November 2023)
Finding 3: Expert Discussion Forum increased teacher buy-in to Character Counts!
Post-survey data reveals that all participants provided positive feedback on the Character Counts Expert Discussion forum. Participants felt comfortable sharing their thoughts and reported an increased sense of ownership in the Character Counts Program through the forum.
Implications
In exploring recommendations for further research, it is evident that teachers are seeking increased autonomy in the implementation of the Character Counts program. Additionally, they express a strong desire for greater input regarding Choice boards. However, a significant challenge arises in finding time for curriculum chats, often conflicting with other commitments such as parent conferences. Despite the autonomy granted to teachers, there appears to be a deficiency in communication channels. Teachers often express frustration and seek avenues for venting. Creating a space for open dialogue about student trends and behaviors proves essential, as hearing about similar challenges encourages educators to explore innovative solutions.
Implications for improving the Character Counts program include adjusting the membership of the Steering Committee and conducting surveys with students to gather their insights on choice boards.
References
Lee, S. W., & Min, S. (2017). RIDING THE IMPLEMENTATION CURVE: Teacher Buy-In and Student Academic Growth under Comprehensive School Reform Programs. The Elementary School Journal, 117(3), 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1086/690220
Macy and Wheeler. (2020). Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Factors that Influence Teacher Buy-in. The International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership, Vol. 28, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.18848/2329-1656/CGP/v28i01/17-33
Ravitch, Diane. (2016, 3rd Edition). The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education. New York: Basic Books.
Fullan, M. (2010). All systems go: The change imperative for whole system reform (1st ed.). Corwin. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452219554